4/6/2024 0 Comments Islamic chess piece names![]() ![]() You can also watch the pieces in play at the U.S. Highlights of the show include dozens of antique and vintage Staunton sets, starting with the original 1849 pattern, and continuing through the 169-year timeline to the present day, with sets that show evolving characteristics, as well as Staunton variant patterns.Īlso displayed are many of the precursor chess patterns from the 1700s and 1800s that reinforced the need for a universal standard. White Chess Collection at the Cleveland Public LibraryĪn upcoming exhibition at The World Chess Hall of Fame, entitled The Staunton Standard: Evolution of the Modern Chess Set, celebrates Staunton’s ambitions and success. Highly recognizable, aesthetically pleasing, historically linked, and very practical for chess-playing, the new Staunton design was gradually able to fulfill his stated desires: “… shall be greatly mistaken if … these beautiful pieces do not entirely supersede the ungainly, inexpressive ones we have hitherto been contented with.”Ĭredit Cleveland Public Library Howard Staunton. It is the only chess set design that (since the 1920s) is allowed for tournament play. Indeed, the Staunton Chess-men were (and still are) the perfect standard. Certainly his efforts were motivated by financial profit, but he also fully recognized and touted the benefits of standardization. Howard Staunton was relentless in his promotion of the eponymous design: the vast majority of his columns over the next year and a half (and many columns beyond that) regularly touted the advantages of the chess pieces that bore his name. In a clever marketing strategy, the new pattern was named after the champion himself, and “The Staunton Chess-men” were ready for sale later that month. Staunton announced the new chess set design in September 1849, in his widely-read chess column in the Illustrated London News. Within the mid 19th-century chess world, there was only one man with the clout, the stamina, and the public forum to achieve this goal: the English Chess Champion, Howard Staunton. Unless, of course, the new standard has a champion: a well-known, highly respected person who can announce the new chess design to the world, and then tirelessly seek its widespread adoption. But gaining widespread acceptance and adoption of a new standard is nearly impossible. And still more: the pieces should have some connection with their historical genesis so the knight should retain the characteristics of a horse, the queen should have a crown, the rook is a fortress, the bishop capped with a cleaved mitre, and so on.Ĭonceptualizing a universal design standard, with all of these factors fully accounted for, is a difficult task. And there are more requirements: the appearance of each piece needs to be aesthetically pleasing, as should the chess set as a whole. The pieces shouldn’t tip over easily, nor should they hide other pieces from view, nor should they take up too much (or too little) space on the board. Also required would be important pragmatic considerations. Clearly, a standard was needed: a universal design for all chess pieces, so that a king could be always be identified as a king, the queen as a queen, and so on.īut visual alignment, by itself, is not enough. A chess bishop in England, for instance, had a vastly different appearance from a bishop in France, and neither bishop had any resemblance to the bishop in a so-called Islamic chess set. In the 19th century, that proviso was often unfulfilled. Two players from different parts of the world can sit across from each other and readily engage in chess battle, with one important proviso: Both players must be able to tell which chess piece is which! But the identity and essence of each piece – its moves on the chessboard, its interactions with other pieces, the rules it follows – are uniform across the globe. ![]() is called a cavalier in France, a springer in Germany, and a caballo in Spain. Granted, the pieces have different names in different countries, so a piece named a knight in the U.S. Chess has been called a universal language.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |